Share Your Thoughts

Currently, it’s difficult to distribute the column width equally. There should be a shortcut for that. It should cover both vertical and horizontal distribution imo.

Hi,I am trying to use the new function “GRID” into AutoLayout setting.AS you can see from my image, the component “SIMBOLO” is made by 9 circles, I can easily set the padding between them, and it’s ok. But WHY does the height not fit to the contents?I cannot set HUG contents both. on Height nor Width.This cause a problem in using the istance for misalignment in over-nesting autolayout, as an example. Thank you for the attentionHave a good weekend!

Use caseAdding annotations to a design system to highlight component documentation, export settings, rules etc can be a super powerful use of this tool. When used as instances across multiple files, you can quickly shift+y to check things specific to that module. Solution Allow annotations to be tethered to a published component that will appear on all it’s instances across other files.

what if we can combine 2 style that is both text style and color styleas when i repeat use of a style of both color and text i need to to select seperatly both the stylewhat if we can just add color to our text style and use which ever element we want?!

I would like to see a new property for boolean or the ability to customize states. For example, if I need to use different icon states in a variable component, as in the screenshot. Now we are using a crutch - we are creating several booleans for different states of icon. 

I really don’t appreciate having popups and blinking widgets to switch to dev mode, especially since I’ve multiple times closed such things already.

rename optionthat is how your rename ai option still, one year later works… a completely pointless thing that needs to be constantly edited manually

When I create a color style with a solid color, I have to break the color style to add opacity. I work in areas where I just need to play around with different opacities before I decide the final direction. It would be nice to have the options available to add opacity on a color style and also Blend mode options.

Can we add an empty diamond for my UML diagramsThx in advance

See above screenshot . OLD  UI vs NEW UI3Now the component icon is almost invisible on left sidebar. And it has different icon from actual component, which is confusing

Figma started out as a tool primarily focused on prototyping, with a focus on accessibility and collaboration. Limiting the sharing of prototype links on the sStarter platform goes against this spirit.This alienates non-users from the platform, creating unnecessary barriers and, apparently, only with the aim of monetizing more.I think the company should maintain the possibility of sharing prototypes separately — even if it were limited to one at a time — so that designers and teams can continue to show their work to clients, stakeholders or colleagues without requiring everyone to have an account.Continuing with this limitation could end up shooting themselves in the foot. Many users should start considering more open alternatives, which could be detrimental to the image and growth of the platform in the future.What is your opinion on this?

Whey I design a dialog component with a content slot, I’ve to create a content component to drag into. Doing this for several slots will declutter my canvas. It would be great if you could add custom content directly within a “slot”, without the need to create a component for it. … Like a dedicated slot where you can add content directly by clicking on it.

It doesn't make any sense for me to own the organization, pay for a seat for a professional on my team and not be able to modify the project, nor even manage the access permissions of that project (such as removing people who are no longer part of the project). tip: add permissions to the project owner to manage access.tip 2: add permissions for the project owner to be able to edit the files (even with an added cost) without having to have a new paid seat.

Why is the after-delay trigger limited to 2000ms?Wouldn’t it be better to have more options like a max of 4000ms/5000ms to allow more complexe interactions to happen or even allow more time in one screen if needed?

It takes a long time for styles from a design system to update when used, literally around 5mins before the changes is reflected, for better content if I’m using a current text style and I change to a different text style, it takes close to 5mins before it is eventually changed.

I am enjoying the improvements to annotations, but would like to be able to make a couple of bullet points in an annotation. Ideally we’d have the same support here as we do in comments, where dash + space starts a bullet list. The workaround of opt+8 to insert a bullet character doesn’t bring the indentation and I’d like to keep these points in the same annotation as they are related, and adding more annotations clutters up the file quickly. 

Image parameter adjustmentI can't see the exact parameters that I'm using to increase the exposure or saturation of my images, and if I want to get the exact same exposure increase for another of my images, it's difficult. This makes consistency in long term design pose a difficulty.New UIChanging button icons or changing the position of buttons without improving the experience or adding functionality is not friendly to long-term users. PrototypesI have seen to your growth, and I have seen your efforts, and your intentions. But the limitations of prototype still persist, such as the complaints about all the “on scroll” interacts, also including the inability to trigger a change when the global value changes.

Figma Slides is a great tool, but in order to fully compete with PowerPoint and Google Presentation, this tool must support the presenters’ devices (clickers). The head of the sales department is satisfied with the quality of our presentations, but it is inconvenient to show them to the audience without a clicker. Guys, this is important.

Let's address the elephant in the digital room: Figma's compulsive need to force-feed updates to its users like some overzealous IT administrator. This isn't software evolution - it's digital waterboarding. The complete disregard for user autonomy in their update policy would make even Windows Update blush.Without warning or consent, we're suddenly greeted with relocated features playing hide-and-seek, shortcut keys that now trigger random functions like digital slot machines, and UI elements rearranged with the logic of a toddler playing Tetris. That carefully cultivated muscle memory? Gone. That optimized workflow? Obliterated. All sacrificed at the altar of "progress" that feels suspiciously like change for change's sake.The most infuriating part? The complete lack of new bottom bar. While we're scrambling to meet deadlines, Figma smugly insists we pause our actual work to play archaeological dig through their new interface. Their update notes read like fortune cookie wisdom - "Impr

I’d love see my Figma frame syncs the auto-layout properties when copy-pasting to Figjam.

Some suggested improvements for the Variables DialogIt should be possible to open the Variable Dialog at any time, even if an object is selected. Once open, it already stays open as you interact with objects, so there is no reason that it can only be launched it by deselecting everything first. Make all the Variable Collections available all the time It would be very useful to be able to see the list of all collections all the time  Display Variable Collections and their groups in a tree structure Make each collection a “top level” tree node, showing it’s name followed by a list of modes if it has more than one. Benefits: All available collections would no longer be hidden in a dropown More efficient to switch not just to a different collection but right to a specific group within that collection Could support drag and drop to move variables and groups from one Collection to another when the other has the same number of modes  Variable Collection group branches should support empty

Hi all, I am wondering if it is possible to enable a “push/pull elements below”-function. In my current case I have an accordeon component that changes size based on what instance is selectet / interacted with. Below this component sloser to the bottom of my screen are texts and other elements that are currently “overwritten” by certain expanded instances of my accordeon. In my previous job I worked with Axure and there one can simply select “push/pull widgets below” when adding interactions to a component and all elements on the screen below will be pushed/pulled by the exact difference in height of changed component. Is it possible to add this option in Figma? (I know I could just add all other elements to my component but this would blow up said component way to much and seems unnecessarily complex)

First and foremost, I’m really enjoying using and experimenting with what I can do with Variables. I have barely scratched the surface but feel like these are obvious improvements that should be included in the backlog somewhere: Ability to duplicate Variables Ability to duplicate a Collection Ability to move Variables to another Collection Ability to move a Group to another Collection Ability to move multiple Variables (between Groups and Collections) Add a description for Collections and Groups (I don’t want to repeat the same thing with slight variations for each Variable) Ability to search for a Variable or Group within the Variables window Ability to move the Mode columns within the Variables window [EDIT] When creating Color Variables, I wished that it remembered the last panel I used to create the previous Variable. This would be useful when I’m creating multiple semantic variables via aliasing [EDIT] Ability to scope multiple Variables that are of the same type Thank you so m

Just like we can navigate to the ‘main component’, I would like a functionality that takes me to all the children of a main component. Or does something similar already exist and I’m missing it?

I dunno if this is a bug or an oversight, as it seems very odd that this wasn’t implemented at launch, but can we add variable support to Gap row/column in grid? :)