Share Your Thoughts

The provided palette for text color is not accessible. Most colors do provide sufficient contrast against the white canvas.  I understand the second row of colors would be useful when the text is placed on top of color/darker surfaces, but the colors on the first row should at least meet AA over the white background of the canvas. Otherwise one is forced to always pick a custom color if the background is white, or from the few that provide the most contrast.

Sometimes when too many tabs are open, their names are getting truncated and it would be quite difficult to jump from one tab to another. E.g. tracing a component back to design system to check master component and documentations before jumping back to working file, it would take some time to locate where the working file tab is. Suggesting a feature to incorporate a search bar (collapse if it’s not activated) or even just a keyboard shortcut to let user quickly scroll through and search among opened tabs. Something like command+tab in macOS or control+tab in Figma but with better visual and thumbnails.

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config, and we know there’s a lot to take in.This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Draw. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team. What we’d love to hear from you:What aspects are you most excited about — and why?

Hi, We are using Devin in our Org widely and integration with Figma for Read and Write operations are unavailable at this moment, when can we expect Figma MCP for Devin? Thx 

Hey folks! 👋 I was using Figma’s Swap Library feature recently and came across a little hiccup that I think could use some improvement. You know how it works: when you swap libraries, Figma tries to match styles between the old and new library based on the token names, right? But… when there’s a name change or a slight difference in naming conventions, it just says “None found,” and that’s it. 😅 You’re left with elements still tied to the old library, which can be a bit frustrating, especially when you’ve spent time updating your naming structure to make things more organized or meaningful. What’s the Ask? Can we get

With "Text-wrap: balance" headlines could be made more readable and visually appealing.Here’s how it could look: 

Stamps currently display the name of the user who placed them, but not when they were added. It would be very useful to also show the date and time for each stamp. Our team uses stamps to mark completed items. Being able to see exactly when a stamp was placed would help us better understand progress over time, track when decisions were made, and improve async collaboration. Suggested improvement:Show the date and time together with the user name on hover. This would make stamps significantly more informative, especially for teams using FigJam for workflow tracking and status updates.

It would be great to be able to merge two variables into one, so anywhere where either variable is referenced, the references will now point to the single, merged variable.

 Can we merge all Figma skills into a single one? Otherwise there are too many skills in Codex, all of which are Figma‑related, and they take up too much space.

When I write create long paragraphs with text tool on the Figma I get the unnecessary spaces on edges of the paragraph like below. But I think if there a hyphenation feature (like Adobe Photoshop) it could add dashes automatically on the texts and fix this issue.

I've been using the Figma MCP server with Claude Code to build a design-to-code workflow, and I've hit what feels like a significant gap in the `generate_figma_design` (html-to-design) capture tool. I'd love to see this addressed and wanted to share the use case in detail. The current behaviorWhen generate_figma_design captures a rendered web page, it converts everything to raw Figma geometry — frames, rectangles, and text nodes. Even if the page is built entirely from your published design system components (Button, Tag, Checkbox, etc.), and even if those components have Code Connect mappings configured, the capture output has no awareness of them. You get a pixel-faithful snapshot, but it's "dead" — no component instances, no variable bindings, no variant properties. The gap this createsCode Connect already establishes a bidirectional relationship between Figma components and code componen

Greetings, I’ve been using an AI agent to develop a prompt to review figma concepts to cover the following: UX heuristic using NNg as the foundation, UI errors, and Grammatical errors. The prompt needs to be copied from the Ai tool and implemented in Figma Make. Figma Make has to recreate the reviewed design exactly before this prompt is implemented to review the design. This is a lot of steps to review a designs. Will Figma introduce a a feature to fully review designs on an artboard covering those items? UX errors, UI errors, and grammatical errors?

Request: More access through the Figma MCP when inspecting the node in `dev` mode.Reason: I’d assume (correct me if wrong) this would decrease token usage because of the extra coding data (e.g., setting css styles to `Android`) that Figma already has available.Open to being corrected by the Figma team!

Problem As a front-end programmer I don’t quite grasp the current concept of so called “Local Variables”. For starters, they’re not local, but global. And the thing with global vars is - they make a big mess, like always. For this reason any programming language considers global vars an anti-pattern. But currently, the only way to make a Figma component “stateful” is to keep its “state” in the global namespace. I use quotes for a reason: there is no real state at all, because in Figma there is no an entity like “state of a component”. This all makes flows unmaintainable and prevents us from transferring components between files and projects, because they get transferred without their “state”. So basically you can’t easily reuse components logic. It also doesn’t provide any level of isolation. For example, if I have more than one instance of the same component, how would I distinguish their variables/state

Hi folks! I’ve seen the posts regarding text overrides with nested interactive components but I’m seeing a similar issue with non-interactive components as well. In the example below, I’ve set my text layers to all use the same layer name and have the same hierarchy structure but if I swap one of the nested components it resets everything. Everything works perfectly if each atom component is used individually and not nested in another component though so I’m left 🤔. Any thoughts?

Mural’s tables auto adjust based on items within a cell. If you add another sticky note, the cell expands to accommodate the new sticky. Not having this in Figjam is killing me. 

Currently, when we have many files open in Figma (which is not uncommon in a work context), we tend to lose visibility and access to some of them when trying to switch tabs.Intuitively, I try to scroll horizontally through the open file tabs with no success, which makes navigation quite difficult. As a result, I either have to drag the entire Figma window to the side to expand the view or feel forced to close files just to access others.Is there any plan to improve this usability?Thank you.

It would be a big time saver to preserve the style and formatting of a text layer, when copying and pasting it from one file to another file. Right now the paste operation loses all formatting and I have to re-format the text all over again.

I browse various files in my org very often, and sometimes I’m in dev mode. This automatically subscribes me to notifications which is not what I want.I’d like to be able to set default preferences globally (like “subscribe by default: on/off”), similarly to how another topic states (which to my disappointment didn’t get any replies and was closed for some reason).Or at least the feature to ask me each time to confirm if I want to be subscribed, which obviously would be irritating, but not as irritating as receiving all those notifications and having to open the file to unsubscribe.Or at the very least, to be able to unsubscribe without having to open the file, either from emails or from desktop notifications.

Hi all,First of all, the new Slots feature is truly awesome, I can’t wait to see how in depth we’re going to rework the components of our design system with it. I’d like to suggest a small improvement regarding their visibility. When a slot has no fill or background, it’s basically invisible on the canvas unless you hover over it. This makes it harder to understand the structure of a component at a glance, especially for our designers who are going to consume the components we provide.It would be really helpful if slots could have a dashed outline, similar to the dotted boundary used for variant groups in component sets, so empty slots remain visible without adding a background.I tried looking through the settings to see if this was already an option. If it exists and I simply missed it, my bad. But if not, having something like a default or optional slot outline could make components much easier to read and work with.

When working with multiple shapes, you currently cannot edit the anchor points of multiple shapes at once whether they are unionized or not. At my studio, we are working on incredibly complex UI for vehicles, and products, and this feature would be much appreciated, and would greatly increase the speed of our workflow.

 Hi Figma Team,I’d like to suggest a feature improvement around managing shared design system files.Problem:In our team, multiple designers have edit access to the design system file. This sometimes leads to accidental or unintended changes, and it becomes difficult to track or control who modified key components. Even with version history, identifying and managing these changes is time-consuming.Suggestion:It would be helpful to have an option to “lock” a file (or specific pages/components) to prevent editing by default.Some possible approaches: Ability to lock a file so only selected users can edit Restrict editing of specific components/pages within a file Optional approval flow when someone tries to make changes Temporary unlock option for maintainers Why this helps:This will ensure better co

I would love edit multiple images at the same time and not have to wait till one is done! Very time consuming to have to wait when you have to do 6 or 10.

Searched and didn’t see any mention of this. If you have a file with a blue background that you wanna send to someone to test it can be rough. Custom colors would be cool, but at least being able to pick from like 2-4 would suffice. Thanks!

I use several whiteboards with my students.  We always use the marker option.  The marker option has thin and thick for the stroke mark.  For some students the thin/thick option are think on others it is thin. Looking at the pictures below, how can I get all of my boards to allows for the board 2 marker strokes.  I need thinner options. the screenshots from the different boards prove this is possible.