Suggest a Feature

Currently, publishing components to a shared library requires going through the Assets panel or Publish dialog, where components are listed individually. There's no way to select multiple components directly on the canvas and publish just those.Being able to multi-select components on the canvas and trigger a "Publish selected" action would significantly speed up library maintenance workflows, especially when iterating on a subset of components.

Hi, We are working on a pixelart project and figured out it would actually speedup our workflow A LOT if it was possible to disable Anti-Aliasing everywhere for viewing, editing and exporting. Having the option to disable it per object could also be interesting. Is this something you guys could add? Thank you very much.

Unable to copy modals, popups, menus or other elements that open within a page. When I run the chrome extension any open popup automatically closes on the page. This would be incredibly useful because our product has a lot of modal focused workflows. Other extensions like magicpatterns are able to capture these for a reference. Thanks!

Hey, guys! Recently I start to prototype an UI for LCD display device. It doesn’t have any pixel opacity control, only pure contrast essentially. I discovered Figma doesn’t have any way to turn off anti-aliasing for vectors. So ofcourse I became frustrated. Such cool editor and still don’t have basic things. Guys, we need to cover this.  

As a freelance user of Figma, I find the current seat-based model effective for structured team collaboration, but it creates friction in freelance and cross-workspace scenarios.There are two specific situations where the current model feels restrictive:First, when two already-subscribed users need to collaborate on a single file, one of them may still be treated as an additional billable editor within the other’s workspace. This can lead to a form of duplicate billing, even though both users are already paying for the platform.Second, there is currently no lightweight alternative to full workspace membership for temporary collaboration. Even short-term or file-specific work often requires assigning a full editor seat, which is not always aligned with the scope of the collaboration.A potential improvement could combine both issues by introducing more flexible collaboration options. For example, allowing already-paid users to collaborate across workspaces without triggering additional e

Can we please get the ability to set a components dimensions to Fill Container from right inside the master component, so we don’t have to manually set it each time we pull in an instance. It can get quite annoying, especially when adding items to a Slot.

When a variable is applied to a property (fill, text, spacing, etc.), there's no way to quickly navigate to that variable's definition to edit it. You have to manually open the Variables panel, find the collection, and locate it by name — which is slow when working across large design systems.It would be ideal to have a clickable link on any variable reference in the inspect or design panel that takes you directly to that variable in the Variables panel so you can edit it in place.

Similarly to how in a Git repo we can block any changes to be committed in the main branch, it would be nice to allow the same behavior in Figma. New changes should only come from the merging requests of branches.

This is an idea to allow Figma Admins to customize the instructions that users see when they request an upgrade in their access. This would save time and confusion for Figma Enterprise admins. Here’s why:For Enterprise customers using SCIM, upgrade requests are often handled via tools and processes external to Figma, such as ServiceNow. (The requests are reviewed and approved, then the user is added to the correct ActiveDirectory group).But, users often don’t know this, and when they request an upgraded license (say from View to Dev or Full), the Figma Admin has to intercept the request in the Admin Dashboard and send a separate email to the requester instruction them about the company process that exists outside of Figma. This is extra work for the Admin, and potentially adds confusion and delays to the process.It would be ideal if the Admin could create a custom instruction to be displayed in the upgrade request UI.  The message they would create would vary by company, but would be s

please leave an option for limit internet usage for uswe just want to load the a certain opened tabs not community data load internet is expensive in here and some other countries tnx

When hiding annotations with shift + y or right-clicking on the annotation > hide annotations, there is no clear and persistent visual indicator in the UI showing that the annotations are hidden.I even triggered my company's design time only to later discover that my annotations were hidden and the design was complete hahaha

I'd like to suggest a new feature where I could hover through styles and (temporary) changes color/font at the same moment. 

When I select and drag a slide in the sidebar of Slides, I expect it to be duplicated, just like it would be in Keynote, Google Slides, or like any other object in Figma or other apps.Every single time I work on a presentation, I option drag to duplicate a slide, then accidentally overwrite content that I needed.

In Figma Motion, it’d be cool to set a custom frame as the thumbnail/preview that appears in the main Figma Design view.Not sure determines what’s shown in the ‘Motion’ frame now but it often looks bad and doesn’t offer insight into what the animation is.

In Figma Motion, it’d be useful to have some sort of mirror function, where the first half of the animation plays in reverse after a certain point. I’m imagining a line down the middle of the timeline, which essentially mirrors what came before it, in reverse. It’s a pain tweaking both sides, and trying to figure out the inverse of bezier-curves.Of course it is possible to use the ‘ping-pong’, but this doesn’t do much when exporting.Alternatively, it would help to offer the ability to export ‘ping-pong’ mp4s/gifs etc. 

During the 2024 April Fun Day, Figma introduced four custom cursor styles — 8-bit, Y2K, Aero, and Skeuomorphic — which were available for only one week. Many users loved this feature and were disappointed when it was removed. Currently, there is no way to personalize multiplayer cursor appearance beyond the default style.Why it mattersSelf-expression & Team Identity — Custom cursors make it easier and more fun to identify collaborators in a file, especially in large teams where multiple people are working simultaneously. Engagement & Delight — The positive community response showed that users genuinely enjoyed this feature. Small moments of delight improve the overall product experience. Competitive Differentiation — No other major design tool offers customizable multiplayer cursors. This is a unique, memorable feature that sets Figma apart.Proposed SolutionBring back the four cursor styles from April Fun Day as a permanent account-level setting:Add a "Cursor Style" section und

The “Selection colors” property could use some additional affordances such like highlighting the frame or element where the color is being used. It’s particularly useful when your trying to replace colors so you can apply the right style or variable. The attached image is a very quick representation of the idea.  

Hello!  I’ve been playing around with Figma Motion this days. And it its really exciting! However there’s one thing I really like using in AfterEffects and other that is Shape Morphing - being able to animate a shape changing into a completely different form by changing it’s vector points. Since I really like Figma, not having to use After Effects is such a game changer. Is there any news or future plans to implement this feature? Thank you!

I want to export Figma Slide into JPG file instead of PDF and PPTX, I just want a JPG file. I’ve been searching around But there is no such function.

I work in Figma primarily through shortcuts and keyboard navigation, and the growing set of on-canvas controls have become a real source of friction for me.I use keyboard as much as possible; to move between and into layers, switch tools, and manipulate objects rather than clicking around the canvas. The main exception is when I have to select or move something on the canvas outside the layer-tree that I’m currently in, as it’s faster with mouse. That's when I keep colliding with the on-canvas controls. For example the [+] button for adding variants to a component set, the auto layout padding handles that appear near frame edges, and the recent AI agent button beside selected elements. They are probably useful for many, especially new users, but for me they just cause mis-clicks and clutter the UI.I understand the rationale behind adding those elements. Making features visible on-canvas improves discoverability, which benefits a lot of users, and I'm not suggesting them to be removed.

Figma's current branching is a bottleneck. All branches must come from main.If one designer is working on Feature A (v1.1.0) and another is on Feature B (v1.2.0), the designer on Feature B cannot get updates from Feature A. They are blocked until Feature A is fully merged into main. This forces designers to either wait, or manually copy-paste work, which breaks components and causes errors. The Solution: We Need Git-Style Branching To fix this, we need three features that developers use in Git every day: Branch from Branch: Let me create a new branch from any existing branch, not just main. Update from Branch: Let me "update" my branch by pulling changes from any other branch (e.g., merge Feature A directly into Feature B). "Cherry-Picking": Let me select specific changes (like a single component update) from another branch and pull just that one thing into my branch. This would unblock designers, stop manual copy-pasting, and allow teams to work in parallel safely.

We have a range of team members using Figma, but admin users typically don’t log in regularly or use it day-to-day. As a result, when someone requests edit access, there's often little oversight or context around what approving means for the business.One key issue is that granting edit access automatically assigns a paid editor seat — and this cost gets added to our invoice immediately. Unfortunately, not all team members are aware of this. It’s easy to click “approve” without realising the financial implications.From what I’ve read on this forum, there’s no logical solution to this yet except to request a refund. This is giving ‘dark pattern’ vibes.We have people on the team who should never have Figma access such as executives wanting to modify designs.Suggestions: Add a clear warning or confirmation step when approving edit access that explains a paid seat will be created and billed immediately. Introduce a process for reviewing edit access regularly to ensure seats are still requ

I know it was suggested 5 years ago but with all the new stuff this is so basic to not exist yet.To have an inner stroke and outer stroke at the same time, you have to make 2 containers. 2 too many.Pls we neeeed this

Figma, I’m on my hands and knees begging you to allow us to add links to frames (NOT JUST TEXT), and for those links to be preserved when the file is exported as a PDF.  The need for this is DIRE. PLEASE. 

Hi! I’m currently working in the international company and i need to export some of the formats i’m doing for work in webp format, Figma is the best app to create and manage that frames, but it’s very uncomfortable for me that i have to use plugins to export in webp, because they are exporting all the stuff in zip and i need to put them in the folders (there are many many of them) myself, please add that feature, i’ve seen many people here are requesting it for years. THANK YOU!