Skip to main content
Tom Reem
Figmate
Figmate
May 7, 2025

[Config 2025] Figma Sites is here — let’s hear what you think! 💻

  • May 7, 2025
  • 73 replies
  • 3411 views

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config, and we know there’s a lot to take in.

This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Sites. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team.
 

What we’d love to hear from you:

  • What aspects are you most excited about — and why?
  • Where do you still have questions or want more clarity?
  • Anything that didn’t quite land for you yet?
     

A few quick reminders:

Pinned Reply By Tom Reem

Figma Sites – What We Heard and What’s Next
 

Thank you for sharing

Hi everyone! Thank you for joining the conversation and sharing your experiences with Figma Sites following our Config 2025 announcements. Your posts — from first impressions to deep technical insights — help us understand where Figma Sites is landing well and where we need to refine the experience.

We've read every reply in the thread and are sharing this summary with both our product and engineering teams to help shape what comes next.

 

What we heard

Here are the most common and impactful themes raised by the community here in Figma Forum:

 

1. Accessibility: Export Options & Integration Flexibility

A key request was the ability to export clean, semantic HTML/CSS or integrate Figma Sites with existing CMS tools. Many of you see Figma Sites as a powerful tool — if it can fit into their broader publishing and dev ecosystems.

“Are there plans to allow code export (HTML + CSS for publishing elsewhere, or to integrate into other CMS’s or existing codebases)? That would be the make-or-break feature for my use.” (2 likes)
 — Etienne_Despres

 

2. Accessibility: Structure, Interactions & Design

From nested pages to font fidelity, scroll-to-section behavior to video embeds, designers are eager to bring more interactivity and polish to Sites — especially when building client work or portfolios. Designers illustrated the importance of Figma being sensitive to the folks using this product and the opportunities to make it more accessible for all.

“Figma, at your scale, I would implore you to get this right and not ship products that will perpetuate continued creation of inaccessible digital products. Your average user may never notice these features, or how they could make things worse, not better, for accessibility. And even if they do notice them, some of them seem to actively make it more inaccessible.” (16 likes)
 — Emily Lawes

 

“Do y'all plan to get Figma Sites to the point where it can produce semantic HTML and provide a way to provide accessible names to icon buttons and images? [...]  I hope that as you iterate on this product you ensure the folks paying to use it are set up for success.” (16 likes)
 — shkeating

 

3. Rollout Access Clarity

Many of you were excited to try Sites but weren’t sure why the feature wasn’t available yet — especially those on paid plans. Questions about seat types, timing, and how to actually find Sites in the UI came up frequently.

 

“Just upgraded my account to try Figma Sites. Have a full seat on Pro. See no access to Figma Sites anywhere... any ideas?” (3 likes)
 — matt abrams

 

 

What we're doing with this feedback

We’ve shared your input directly with the teams working on Figma Sites and are actively tracking themes that surfaced most frequently, and — in a few cases, updates are already underway.

Here’s where some of that feedback stands now:

  • Accessibility: A substantial portion of your feedback emphasized semantic HTML and assistive tech compatibility. We support tagging today, and are exploring how to improve semantic structure across blocks, including default behaviors that impact screen readers. Keep an eye on this Figma Sites article — Improve the accessibility of your site — we’ll continue updating it with fresh resources and guidance as they become available. More to come soon!
     
  • Export & CMS Support: Code export  and CMS integrations are top-of-mind. While not available yet, these areas are being explored for future roadmap considerations — especially as more teams request publishing flexibility.
     
  • Font Fidelity & Customization: Good news — custom fonts support is coming soon. We’ve heard your reports on Google Fonts and variable text rendering inconsistencies. These issues are under investigation, and we’re reviewing how font handling can better match your design file expectations.
     
  • Nested Pages & URL Structure: This is a frequently requested improvement, and we’re gathering examples to explore solutions that support scalable site architecture. Most recently, we announced updates to apex domain support. Learn more here: Apex domains and custom subdomains in Figma Sites.
     
  • Component Behavior & Breakpoints: Multiple users noted differences between Figma Design and Sites when it comes to variables, auto layout, and component states. We’re reviewing this feedback to smooth out those inconsistencies and make responsive behavior more predictable and performant. For more details and latest updates, keep an eye on this article: Create a responsive component that automatically adapts to each breakpoint.

💡We’ll continue to update release notes and relevant forum threads as improvements go live. Keep an eye out at: Figma product news & release notes.

 

What’s next — want to keep the conversation going?

 

🎟️ Save your seat! Be sure to RSVP for our upcoming release notes LIVE on July 31, 2025 at 8:00AM PT / 11:00AM ET / 5:00PM CET: Live from Figma, it’s Release Notes! → Register.

 

Still have more to add? We’d love to hear more:

Again, we're deeply grateful for your thoughtful posts — from detailed bug reports to feature improvements. Your feedback helps ensure Figma Sites is accessible for everyone.

73 replies

lex brooks
New Member
May 20, 2025

So Figma Designs previously exported to Webflow to make it a seamless process from autolayout in Figma to then full design and animation in Webflow. Is that integration going away? Or will Figma Sites allow export to Webflow still but make that faster? Where do all the integrations play with Sites vs Design, seems weird to have it as a separate ecosystem? I want to play with Sites, but based on all of this forum info, seems like a waste of time until Google fonts, spacing and accessibility is rolled out properly? 

Caoimhe
New Member
May 21, 2025

I love the new sites feature but not having the ability to create any dropdowns, popups and overlays is whats really stopping me from using it.. workarounds don’t work well or easy and for now the prototying feature works better. I’d love to see this come into sites as creating live demos of feature before deveopment would be game changing!

Tom Reem
Figmate
Tom ReemAuthor
Figmate
May 21, 2025

Thanks to everyone for sharing feedback and questions about Figma Sites — a few clear themes have emerged, and I want to highlight and reflect on them here. Some of these echo earlier patterns, and others dig deeper. We don’t have timelines to share yet, but your input is already helping inform what we prioritize next.

 

With that, here’s what I’m seeing come up from the folks in the forum here:

  1. There is a need for more accessibility features. We currently support accessibility tagging in the design panel and are continuing to make improvements so that websites are optimized for screenreaders. Learn more about how you can make your Figma Site accessible.
     
  2. Typography and font support matter deeply. Without consistency between the design file and the published site designers and engineers are running into friction they weren’t expecting. People want creative control and accuracy across breakpoints.
     
  3. Component and variable behavior could be more consistent between Design and Sites. For people trying to reuse established design systems and patterns, this disconnect results in manual rework.
     
  4. Responsive behavior and breakpoints would improve with more flexibility. Folks with custom grid settings or tightly controlled responsive layouts are running into conflicts, layout bugs, or unclear behavior when switching between views. Others noted that without true fluid/responsive behavior this version feels a bit rigid.
     
  5. Embeds, video playback, and scroll behavior are areas for continued improvement. These little things add up quickly when building interactive pages.
     
  6. Animations and transitions: powerful, but could be more scalable. One person put it perfectly: “Custom, but individual.” They want to scale design motion without reinventing it each time.

 

Thank you again for taking the time to reflect here. It helps us better understand what’s resonating, what’s missing, and how we can support your workflows.

Bryce_Driesenga
Active Member
May 22, 2025

I’m trying to recreate an effect I’ve prototyped in Figma Design and having no luck. To achieve it, I basically animate a mask in from the left, pause, then slide out to the right.

In Sites, I’ve tried adding a reveal interaction to the mask (also tried the layers inside the mask) having it slide in from the left, then slide out to the right. It never seems to actually animate and I either don’t see the text at all or I just see the text static. Is it not possible to use interactions on masks?
 

 

antinux
New Member
May 23, 2025

We just wrapped the big announcements at Config, and we know there’s a lot to take in.

This thread is your space to share reactions, ask questions, and let us know what you're excited about (or still curious about) with regard to Figma Sites. Our team will be actively reading and sharing relevant takeaways with the product team.
 

What we’d love to hear from you:

  • What aspects are you most excited about — and why?
  • Where do you still have questions or want more clarity?
  • Anything that didn’t quite land for you yet?
     

A few quick reminders:



Is Figma Sites going to be available for Education plan? It would truly be a game changer!
 

Cassiana Ferraz
New Member
May 26, 2025

It would be important for us to be able to make website links private. We want to be able to publish, but not have it open to just anyone.

 

Jochem Rebergen
New Member
June 4, 2025

Any news on Figma Sites going public with the suggested feedback ​@Tom Reem ?

I’m desperately waiting for these and CMS features to use in production 🙏🏻

Mel Choyce
New Member
June 5, 2025

Really enjoying playing with Figma Sites so far 🎉

 

Some things I’ve been struggling with:

  1. This is a problem in Figma Design too, but I’d really love to be able to set a consistent link style (and behavior) across a file without needing to hack it together via a component. 
  2. I’d like to have some containers using interesting shapes, not just rectangles, but add auto-layout automatically converts them into flat rectangles. (This one’s probably more of an edge case/specific need, so I understand if this is a long ways out, if ever.)

The rest have been covered in previous feedback roundups.

 

One last request: I’d love to publish my sites to the community! Any chance this will be coming soon?

Serhii D.
New Member
June 9, 2025

I love it, but the whole thing is just a hot mess right now. Currently I’m investigating more than 10 issues that prevent me from creating a rather simple website. Not even mentioning some deeper, much more complex issue with how the whole thing is coded on the back.

Adam14
New Member
June 10, 2025

I’ve found a few issues with Sites. I know its in Beta. However I find it odd that no one caught what I caught before release so perhaps its user error. I will lay out my issues below:-

 

Buttons - I pulled buttons from my design system into my new design in Sites. The buttons are setup with various states - default, hover, focussed etc. I then had the buttons link to another page on the site. This doesn’t work. The states work fine, however I have to spam the button multiple time to get it to take me to the referenced page.

This is also the case for the Nav bar I created as a component, though it does appear to work slightly better. One thing I did with this is to have the link on the nav bar take me to the correct page, on that page I set it as the ‘focussed’ state so that it was highlighted. This seems to work fine. However I cant find a way to have the button set up as ‘Scroll to’ but then highlight once the destination of the scroll is reached.

At the top of the home page - as expected

I then click features to scroll down:- 

 

‘About’ stays highlighted and I cant find a way to change this state and have Features in a focussed state.

This button for example:-

 

This is prototyped to take me to the @products’ page, but I have to spam it to get it to work. The first few clicks cycle through the states I gave it before it decides to go anywhere. It does work like this in Figma Design. They just seem to work. Do I need a different approach here?

I also have some other buttons for a carousel with a default state and one ‘pressed’ state. Once I made the carousel it wouldn’t work until I removed the ‘pressed’ interaction from the child component.

I hope someone can help.