Areas of Improvement 

1.Slow Rendering Performance:   
Issue:  

The rendering of design changes is significantly delayed - taking approximately 7–8 minutes to reflect even minor updates (e.g., spacing or alignment tweaks). This lag impacts design iteration velocity.  
 
Suggestion:  

Optimize rendering speed by reducing response times for minor design changes—such as alignment or spacing—to enable faster, more fluid iteration. 

2. Scaling Issues: 

Issue:  

Certain visual elements and components (e.g. charts/tables) do not scale appropriately to fit within their container dimensions. This results in misalignment, clipping, or incomplete rendering, negatively impacting usability and the overall user experience. 

Suggestion:  

Implement responsive design techniques to ensure visual elements adjust dynamically based on container size. Consider auto scaling or adaptive rendering logic to maintain readability and alignment.  
Introduce overflow UI like adding scrollbars, truncation indicators, or responsive containers to display hidden data clearly when content exceeds the viewable area. 

3.Inconsistent Output Based on Input Parameters: 

Issue:  

When specific input parameters are provided, the initial output may render as expected. However, interacting with or switching between different components can lead to changes in the output that do not align with the original input. Such inconsistencies can undermine user trust and the perceived reliability of the system. 
 
Suggestion:  

Ensure state persistence across interactions so that input parameters are retained consistently throughout component changes 

Prompt Interpretation & Predictability 

1. Unpredictable Output Despite Clear Input:  

Issue: 
Even when users attach screenshots or give detailed prompts, the design results vary. This lack of predictability affects user confidence and efficiency.  
 

2. Prompt-Output Misalignment:  

Issue: 
The visual output often does not adhere to the scale or structure described in the prompt. This makes it difficult to iterate or build consistent design systems.  

3. Component Instability:  

Issue: 
Certain prompts (referred to as “X” prompts) break existing design components, requiring users to reconstruct elements from scratch. This leads to frustration   

Design Consistency and Quality 

1. Cosmetic Issues:  

Issue: 
There are frequent problems with alignment and spacing in the generated designs. These minor issues accumulate and degrade the overall quality of the UI output. 
 

Positive Highlights 

1. Design Iteration Support: 
Component Variations Provided:  
Figma Make is effective at offering variations for components, which helps users compare options and make faster design decisions.