Coming from a design org where designers with full-seats have a variety of workflow-types. Some designers leverage AI heavily while others do not, thus some designers burn through AI credits and others have a generous amount that go to waste in that AI credit cycle.
This trend can vary, of course, so as an admin, I think it would benefit our organization with some type of allocation or redistribution of AI credits to those seats who rely on them during a given credit cycle—credits that are technically available within our organization. It could even be a designer-to-designer interaction where Designer A shares 1000 credits with Designer B if they know they don’t need all their credits that cycle.
Is anyone else seeing this trend in their organization, or see this as a potential scenario? I want to make sure we’re getting the most for our money and optimizing resources across the team.
AI Credit Distribution / Org Credit Sharing
Agreed, we have several full seats who don’t use their credits meanwhile I’m burning through mine mostly just correcting the AI’s mistakes. The whole credit system needs a rework, its painfully flawed.
+1
if we can’t do user transfer for full seats, I would highly recommend having “total credits” for an organisation per full seats and remove the user allocation! It really doesn’t makes sense to cap power users to 4250!
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.